Feeds

84630 items (0 unread) in 24 feeds

SHOPPING SITES!

Handmade Jewelry
Spiritual Gifts
King Solomon Amulets
Unique Gift Ideas





65 items tagged "We"

Related tags: what [+], of [+], more [+], hate [+], Need [+], Your [+], Kids [+], how [+], do [+], can [+], things [+], way [+], the [+], read [+], now [+], lost [+], live [+], in [+], i [+], here [+], because [+], as [+], are [+], am [+], This [+], Say [+], Madonna [+], Halle [+], Berry [+], actually [+], like [+], took [+], running [+], press [+], nice [+], might [+], loved [+], if [+], high [+], have [+], fast [+], dream [+], come [+], children [+], change [+], cant [+], california [+], cafe [+], bitch [+], believe [+], bands [+], all [+], Why [+], Watch [+]

Gawker

  • Permalink for 'Gawker/2008/10/08/_Mad_Men_s_Tiny_Anachronisms__Things_We_Actually_Like__'

    Mad Men's Tiny Anachronisms [Things We Actually Like]

    Posted: October 8th, 2008, 3:49pm CDT by Richard
    Tagsthings We actually like  

    AMC's Mad Men, about Madison Avenue ad execs in the early 1960's, is meticulous in its period detailing—just the right mod sofa is moored in every living room, the ladies could have purchased their outfits on 5th Avenue just that afternoon, even the food is done retro (heavy, simple, ew). So it's sort of hilarious to see a dedicated fan of the show nitpick over its tiny details, finding cracks in its carefully put together 1960's veneer. Mark Simonson has done just that, down to the aging of a plastic shield on a typewriter and the fonts on various briefly-shown adds. Some examples of Simonson's delightfully obsessed Madness lie after the jump.

    "Gill Kayo did exist at the time, but wasn’t in style yet and feels out of place on this church flyer. Gotham (2002) is just wrong. The blown up vintage clip art seems odd here, too. The whole layout has a Kinko’s feel to it."


    "This beer label caught my eye: Was there really a Fielding beer brand that had labels exactly like Hamm’s beer, but with green instead of blue? (By the way, the beer cans in the show are opened with can openers. No pop-tops here. Nice detail.)"


    "Whoops—Zapfino (1998). I guess they use Macs."


    "Alert fans have noted that Seventies-era IBM Selectric II typewriters are used on the show, but even these have visible signs of age, such as the yellowed plastic shield you can see in this shot. I wish they would figure out a way to make these props look less aged. I sometimes feel like these characters are living in a retro museum instead of 1960s New York."


    See the rest of his nitpickery here.


  • Permalink for 'Gawker/2008/10/08/_Darren_Aronofsky_s_Early_Career_Comeback__Things_We_Actually_Like__'

    Darren Aronofsky's Early Career Comeback [Things We Actually Like]

    Posted: October 8th, 2008, 10:31am CDT by Richard
    Tagsthings We actually like  

    After slogging through The Fountain, a strenuous mindfuck dirge about death and time travel and Ponce de León (sort of?), and watching its resounding failure at the box office, it was easy to think that the film's writer/director/envisioner Darren Aronofsky might never be trusted with a film again. And certainly the exciting director of Pi and Requiem for a Dream's next effort, The Wrestler, is significantly scaled back from the tens-of-millions of dollars fountain of youth blunderbuss, but it's proving to be bigger than the previous film could have hoped for. An early-career Aronofsky comeback!

    The Wrestler, which stars Mickey Rourke in what is said to be a career-reviving performance (though, didn't they say that about Sin City too?), was a huge hit at the Toronto and Venice film festivals, and has found both domestic and foreign distributors. This all lines up nicely with Aronofsky's next film, a high profile picture for Paramount called The Fighter, starring little-known actors named Brad Pitt and Mark Wahlberg. So maybe he's been forced to genre himself up a bit (I mean, was Requiem for a Dream genre? Arm-Sever Cinema?), but he's back in the ring (har) after one terrifically nasty KO. Plus he's married to Rachel Weisz, one of the most beguiling and enchanting actresses working today, so he's got that going for him too.


  • Permalink for 'Gawker/2008/10/06/_Poster_Boy_Gets_Profiled_for_Subway_Mashups__Things_We_Actually_Like__'

    Poster Boy Gets Profiled for Subway Mashups [Things We Actually Like]

    Posted: October 6th, 2008, 9:22am CDT by Sheila
    Tagsthings We actually like  

    Guerrilla artist Poster Boy razors away parts of subway advertisements and sticks them onto other subway posters. The end result: funny social commentary, often involving the unfortunate use of celeb's faces! New York magazine talked to him about why he does it: “No matter what I do... as long as I did something to those advertisements and that saturation, it’s political. It’s anti-media, anti–established art world.”

    But by the spring he was incorporating social critiques, rearranging the Iron Man logo into IRAN=NAM, and altering an NYPD recruitment-drive poster to read MY NYPD KILLED SEAN BELL.

    “No copyright, no authorship,” he says. “A social thing, as opposed to being an artist making things for bored rich people to hang above their couch.”

    Very high-minded! And then there's this:

    How Poster Boy Turns Subway Ads Into Political Art [New York]
    [Photo: Poster Boy's Flickr]


  • Permalink for 'Gawker/2008/10/03/_Where_is_Sarah_Palin_in_Her_Cycle_Right_Now___What_We_Need_More_Of_Is_Science__'

    Where is Sarah Palin in Her Cycle Right Now? [What We Need More Of Is Science]

    Posted: October 3rd, 2008, 2:10pm CDT by Sheila
    Tagswhat We Need more of  

    Is Sarah Palin ovulating? It's a personal question, but we need to know. Last year, a highly-publicized study of strippers found that dancing girls always earned more during the time of the month when they were most fertile. Simply put, men were more attracted to them for reasons they were not aware of and could not control. With that in mind, ovulation may be part of the reason that Palin charmed a certain segment of American during the debates last night. I mean, check this out:

    • Rollins gave 10 points to Palin on CNN.
    • "Sarah Palin was sensational tonight... she wiped the floor with Joe Biden." -Pat Buchanan on MSNBC
    • "Palin too projects through the screen like crazy. I’m sure I’m not the only male in America who, when Palin dropped her first wink, sat up a little straighter on the couch and said, “Hey, I think she just winked at me.” And her smile. By the end, when she clearly knew she was doing well, it was so sparkling it was almost mesmerizing. It sent little starbursts through the screen and ricocheting around the living rooms of America." -Richard Lowry, pundit on National Review’s The Corner blog. [via Wonkette]
    • "She delivered big-time... It was the best 90 minutes this campaign has had in two weeks... Whatever expectations there were, she blew them away." -Tom Rath, New Hampshire-based GOP strategist. [Washington Post]

    All from (admittedly Republican) men. Coincidence? No, Joe—pheromones, transmitted through the TV.

    That said, even if men seem to like Palin more than women do, that doesn't mean they'll vote for her McCain. Because, continuing this logic, the same dudes love strippers, but not for marrying.


  • Permalink for 'Gawker/2008/10/03/_Child_O_Reilly_Remarkably_Similar_To_Real_O_Reilly__Things_We_Actually_Like__'

    Child O'Reilly Remarkably Similar To Real O'Reilly [Things We Actually Like]

    Posted: October 3rd, 2008, 7:54am CDT by Ryan Tate
    Tagsthings We actually like  

    It's no surprise that Fox News shouting head Bill O'Reilly, with his frequent temper tantrums and one-note commentary, can be accurately impersonated by a child. What is startling is that a kid could do it so well. "The Lil O'Reilly Factor" sets itself apart from lesser YouTube parodies by being fast, funny, well-written and executed without any verbal stumbles. Take the audio track down a couple of octaves and, with your eyes closed, you could mistake this video for the real thing. Adult online humorists should take note. And O'Reilly, if he's smart, will start scouting for Lil' Keith Olbermann, which could be just as devastating. [via Soup Cans]


  • Permalink for 'Gawker/2008/09/24/_Americans_Scramble_To_Offer_Bundles_Of__Shit__For_Sale_To_Government__Things_We_Actually_Like__'

    Americans Scramble To Offer Bundles Of 'Shit' For Sale To Government [Things We Actually Like]

    Posted: September 24th, 2008, 9:52am CDT by Moe
    Tagsthings We actually like  

    Tom Brokaw of all people has a funny column in today's Journal about all the distressed assets 'Main Street' types would like to sell Treasury Secretary Hank Paulson. For instance, Barney "Big Un" Baumgartner of Wyoming — a real person, I checked — is offering an 80% stake in his gambling debts and taxidermy business for $1.8 million. The column is labeled 'humor' as if the Journal needs to remind you it does not find the actual bailout to be a joke. But they are are alone in that respect! Because the great untold story of this column the Journal can't tell you because they don't use swear words is the brand-new awesome website BuyMyShitPile.com, wherein average U.S. Americans are offering to unload their most illiquid investments — like this attractive house, Hank's for $269,000,000! — at what they believe to be fair "Hold To Maturity" prices or whatever. Our favorite shit after the jump:

    The "Top Shit" is all pretty Lol, but be sure not to miss
    1.The Entire GDP Of China, Inside My House

    2. Loan To Retarded Brother And Sister-In-Law

    3. Tom Friedman ha ha and (seriously)

    4. Worst columnist ever Michael Gerson

    From Brokaw:

    - A pawn shop in Reno, Nev., has an excess supply of eight-track cassette players, flower print shirts, broad white belts and Wayne Newton tapes, having gambled that the '70s would come roaring back. The owner pleaded for a Treasury take-over, arguing, "How can the government stand by and let such a rich part of our American culture simply fade away?"

    - The owner of an NFL poster shop in Green Bay, Wis., reports that he has given up on divine intervention and is now asking for Treasury to take over his business in a last-ditch effort to preserve the notion that whatever our differences, we're all Americans.

    Asked how his business got into trouble, Karl Andursen of Muledeer, Minn., said he met a man who specialized in printing Minnesota Viking and Chicago Bears posters. Mr. Andursen said the man was willing to bundle his posters and sell them at a discounted rate to anyone who would take over the Green Bay territory.

    Mr. Andurson said in the back of his mind he knew that could be risky since Green Bay is sacred ground for Packer fans who wouldn't cheer for the Vikes or the Bears if they were promised a fleet of new snowmobiles and lifetime hunting rights on Brett Favre's farm.

    But, as he said, everyone was in the NFL merchandise game and he figured he'd take the territory and after 30 days flip the franchise for a big profit. A year later and he's not made a sale, not one, but who knew?

    He's offered his complete inventory of Go Bears! and Vikings Rock! posters for 20 cents on the dollar or $500,000 in 30-year Treasury bonds.

    (Personally, everything I ever buy is liquid so I don't have much to add to this list. But I hear Jezebel editor Dodai is moving this weekend!)


  • Permalink for 'Gawker/2008/09/19/_Scientists_Explain_Why_People_Vote_For_Republicans__What_We_Need_More_Of_Is_Science__'

    Scientists Explain Why People Vote For Republicans [What We Need More Of Is Science]

    Posted: September 19th, 2008, 11:08am CDT by Pareene
    Tagswhat We Need more of  

    Every election season, commentators trot out the old statistics about how more education makes people more likely to support Democrats, more studies are published on how liberal Daily Show viewers are so well-informed, and various smart people try to explain why anyone would ever vote for a Republican, against their "self-interest." This month has seen three alarming and remarkable scientific investigations into Americans' inexplicable habit of voting for George Bush and John McCain. Which means: trend! Hooray! Let's take a look at what America's top scienticians say about fucking idiot flyover losers and their stupid voting:

    Conservatives Are Scared A Lot

    Rice University Political Scientist John Alford published some research in the creatively named journal Science about a possible biological basis to liberalism and conservatism. Basically, "46 mostly white Midwesterners who self-identified as having strong political beliefs" were shown "threatening images" ("a large spider on someone's face, a bloodied person and maggot-filled wound"). The conservatives were more scared, of all of the images. Or, as Newsweek puts it, "illegal immigrants may = spiders = gay marriages = maggot-filled wounds = abortion rights = bloodied faces. " Liberals were not sensitive to the scary images. Which means they're biologically inferior, because they'd die if a gay spider tried to abort their faces to death. Notable problems with this study: small sample, also wtf this doesn't explain anything.

    Conservatives Refuse to Believe "Facts"

    The most upsetting and alarming research? Probably Brendan Nyhan and Jason Reifler's backfire effect study. In that, the political scientists took two groups of volunteers and gave them the Bush administration's prewar claims that Iraq was a threat and had weapons of mass destruction.

    One group was given a refutation — the comprehensive 2004 Duelfer report that concluded that Iraq did not have weapons of mass destruction before the United States invaded in 2003. Thirty-four percent of conservatives told only about the Bush administration's claims thought Iraq had hidden or destroyed its weapons before the U.S. invasion, but 64 percent of conservatives who heard both claim and refutation thought that Iraq really did have the weapons. The refutation, in other words, made the misinformation worse.

    This "backfire" effect only worked on conservatives. Even when they varied the source of the refutations, it made no difference—corrections from the New York Times and Fox News both caused conservatives to believe the lies even harder. In other words, objective truth is dead, observable reality is a fairy tale, etc.

    Conservatives Have An Entirely Different Moral Code

    This should bring you down, a little bit. Jonathan Haidt, a psychologist, wrote a lengthy anthropological investigation into why people vote for Republicans. It's not the Thomas Frank "they are distracted by bullshit" explanation, though it is related: they have different cultural standards of ethics and morality! Liberals and college students define morality as "how we treat each other," conservatives attach more significance to "supporting essential institutions, and living in a sanctified and noble way." Liberals recognize fairness and care as important moral virtues, conservatives add to that loyalty, respect for authority, and duty. The educated moral relativism worldview is fundamentally incompatible with the way like 50% of America thinks, and stereotypes about out-of-touch elitist coastal democrats are basically correct. Sigh.

    So What Have We Learned?

    Conservatives respond instinctually, not rationally, to scary images, "facts," and institutions. Whether this is innate and biological or cultural seems still up in the air. Democrats can't with with logical arguments or even appeals to the innate rightness of concepts like "diversity" and "tolerance," because those aren't considered essentially good and important by the voters they're trying to appeal to. This does suggest that an appeal to old New Deal institutional concepts like the Welfare State might actually be effective, if they're wrapped in the flag and a sense of duty. Also scientists still consider the majority of Americans to be like a fascinating exotic backwards tribe and the fucking country is doomed.


  • Permalink for 'Gawker/2008/09/18/_Don_t_Let_A_Blow_Job_Compromise_Your_Health___Things_We_Actually_Like__'

    Don't Let A Blow Job Compromise Your Health! [Things We Actually Like]

    Posted: September 18th, 2008, 1:34pm CDT by Hamilton Nolan
    Tagsthings We actually like  

    At a time when our young people are getting STDs from playing too much beer pong and Christian politicos can't even keep their own kids celibate, America is plainly in need of a useful public sex education campaign. Well, we won't get it; this country can't even tolerate Eva Mendes' nipple yet. You have to go to Belgium, where sex in advertising is a form of art! Below is a new Belgian PSA that is perhaps the single best piece of televised sex ed I've ever seen. That ain't mouthwash, yall:

    [via Adrants]


  • Permalink for 'Gawker/2008/09/18/_The_Bad_Moms__Club__We_Hate_Your_Kids__'

    The Bad Moms' Club [We Hate Your Kids]

    Posted: September 18th, 2008, 11:34am CDT by Sheila
    TagsWe hate Your Kids  

    Home-schooling? So over. Try city-schooling your kids at the Met and trendy bars. That's what The Professors' Wives' Club author Joanne Rendell is doing. How does an un-schooled Manhattan five-year-old spend his days? It has its advantages: "Un-kindergarten for us means Benny can sleep late so I can write. It means we don't have to worry about bedtimes and can go out on the town with friends any night of the week. We can go to Europe and visit my family when the flights are cheap..."

    Heh. It's like she's trying to provoke criticism from the blogs.

    "Now, in the warm afternoon sun, Benny is playing with two other kids in a strip of mud in a small backyard. His two friends are completely naked. Benny has on his underpants and a pair of socks. Almost every inch of childish skin, cotton, and hair is covered with wet, sticky dirt. The kids are completely absorbed in the task at hand: burying a bobbing-eyed baby doll in the dirt. At the moment, the doll's torso and legs are completely submerged. Her head is exposed, but one eyelid is held down by mud. An earthworm wriggles just a couple of inches away from the doll's shining plastic scalp.

    We mothers and one father sit nearby drinking cool beer..."

    Confused. Is the burying the doll in the mud part a metaphor? Because that's metaphorically what we do all day at work, too.

    Unschooling [Babble]


  • Permalink for 'Gawker/2008/09/17/_One_Carla_Bruni_Is_Worth_a_Thousand_Cindy_McCains__Things_We_Actually_Like__'

    One Carla Bruni Is Worth a Thousand Cindy McCains [Things We Actually Like]

    Posted: September 17th, 2008, 9:29am CDT by Richard
    Tagsthings We actually like  

    As a commenter put so depressingly yesterday, France gets Carla Bruni and we get Sarah Palin. Or, as the case may be, we get Cindy McCain. That potential first lady is a cold and at times cruel liar (according to Ariel Levy, at least), while Bruni—despite her many booji faults—is at least interesting. The nudie patootie French first lady is, well, gorgeous, but beside that she's chic and smart and Italian and talented and she dated Mick Jagger. Plus, she's a singer/songwriter who performed on the BBC last night. So who cares that she has a strange marriage to a really conservative French politician. We're just endlessly fascinated with her, because we here in American Wife land haven't really ever seen anything like it. And hey! Vanity Fair agrees with us.


  • Permalink for 'Gawker/2008/09/16/_The_Much_Vaunted_LOLcat_Blog_to_Book__Things_We_Actually_Like__'

    The Much-Vaunted LOLcat Blog-to-Book [Things We Actually Like]

    Posted: September 16th, 2008, 2:28pm CDT by Sheila
    Tagsthings We actually like  

    A couple months ago, we LOL'd at the book proposal for the upcoming LOLcats book, I Can Has Cheezburger? Then, in a blog-to-book roundup, we declared "do not want" on the LOLcat book, explaining, "The LOLcats experience is fleeting; the site stuffed with content, and copycat sites abound." We were right about some of these blog-to-books: the rushed-to-print Stuff White People Like, for instance, sucked and did not merit a review. But! We have the LOLcats books in our hands right now, and we'd like to overturn our previous verdict of DO NOT WANT.

    The new book is little and cute and we want!

    It may not be necessary for the Internet savvy among us (like everyone reading), but it makes a cute gift for someone like your grandma who doesn't understand the Internet but probably would understand funny captioned cat-photos. In the proposal, the authors assured they wouldn't be "just slapping some lolcats on a page and calling it a book." But that's exactly what they ended up doing! It doesn't matter, though. Because today we LOL'd, and we really needed to. And that is the power of the LOLcats.

    Update: On the book's Amazon.com page, we noticed something very weird: